Check-up handover
Consider how a reviewed ECG report might sit alongside other check-up information.
PLANNED · FUTURE COLLABORATION
ECG Report Communication
Make the report easier to follow.
A future collaboration idea: help organize an existing ECG report into a patient explanation after clinical review. Analysis and diagnosis remain outside this preview.
PRODUCT CONCEPT03 / SINAR
From report to a clearer conversation.
Hospital report
Communication draft
Doctor review
Patient version
A report communication concept, with scope still open.
CARE SETTINGS
Explore the communication around ECG.
Potential settings for discussion, not a list of supported services.
Consultation preparation
Organize the report’s existing wording and questions to discuss with the care team.
Language support
Explore a patient explanation in a familiar language without adding new findings.
PLANNED WORKFLOW
Start with a report, not a waveform.
This future flow concerns communication of existing clinical content. Responsibilities and partner scope remain undefined.
Existing ECG report
Use a report already interpreted by qualified healthcare professionals.
Communication draft
Arrange the existing content into understandable sections.
Doctor review
Check meaning and decide what is appropriate to communicate.
Patient reading
Present the approved explanation using the agreed language and channel.
FIXED CONCEPT DEMONSTRATION
An information structure to discuss.
The cards show section labels only. They do not contain patient findings, diagnostic interpretations or ECG traces.
Existing clinical report
Examination context
Report type and examination information supplied by the institution.
Clinician interpretation
Existing clinical text, kept as the authoritative source.
Review responsibility
Who would check the communication before release.
Patient questions
A space for questions the care team would choose to include.
Proposed patient explanation
What this report covers
A clinician-approved description of the examination.
Terms in familiar language
Explanation of source terminology, subject to clinical and language review.
Questions for the care team
Follow-up questions drawn only from approved report content.
Field labels only. No patient findings, waveform or image analysis is provided.
PRODUCT BOUNDARIES
Clear responsibilities. Open questions.
- No waveform processing, arrhythmia detection or ECG diagnosis is offered.
- No partner, algorithm, device connection or production service is confirmed.
- Any future communication workflow needs agreed clinical review and release responsibilities.
DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Questions to resolve together.
Security and clinical responsibility should be defined before any real deployment.
Data minimization
Define the minimum information needed for each workflow.
Access control
Specify who can see drafts and approved reports.
Clinical review
Define approval and release responsibilities with the care team.
INDUSTRY CONTEXT
A perspective from the wider field.
The reference below describes an external organization. It does not demonstrate Sinar capabilities or imply a partnership.
Philips announced an ECG AI Marketplace in July 2025, describing cardiac AI insights within ECG ordering and interpretation workflows.
What this means for our concept
The reference illustrates an external diagnostic workflow. Sinar’s concept here is limited to communication of an existing reviewed report; it does not implement Philips or Anumana technology.
START A CONVERSATION
Contact our business team.
This is a static product preview. For product questions or collaboration, please email us.
Business enquiriesericlee@verilocale.com